Pertanyaan yang diberi tag z-statistic

55
Wald test untuk regresi logistik

Sejauh yang saya mengerti tes Wald dalam konteks regresi logistik digunakan untuk menentukan apakah variabel prediktor tertentu signifikan atau tidak. Ia menolak hipotesis nol dari koefisien yang sesuai menjadi nol.XXX Tes terdiri dari membagi nilai koefisien dengan kesalahan standar...

logistic z-statistic
20
Apa nilai yang benar untuk presisi dan mengingat dalam kasus tepi?

Presisi didefinisikan sebagai: p = true positives / (true positives + false positives) Apakah benar bahwa, sebagai true positivesdan false positivespendekatan 0, presisi mendekati 1? Pertanyaan yang sama untuk diingat: r = true positives / (true positives + false negatives) Saat ini saya...

precision-recall data-visualization logarithm references r networks data-visualization standard-deviation probability binomial negative-binomial r categorical-data aggregation plyr survival python regression r t-test bayesian logistic data-transformation confidence-interval t-test interpretation distributions data-visualization pca genetics r finance maximum probability standard-deviation probability r information-theory references computational-statistics computing references engineering-statistics t-test hypothesis-testing independence definition r censoring negative-binomial poisson-distribution variance mixed-model correlation intraclass-correlation aggregation interpretation effect-size hypothesis-testing goodness-of-fit normality-assumption small-sample distributions regression normality-assumption t-test anova confidence-interval z-statistic finance hypothesis-testing mean model-selection information-geometry bayesian frequentist terminology type-i-and-ii-errors cross-validation smoothing splines data-transformation normality-assumption variance-stabilizing r spss stata python correlation logistic logit link-function regression predictor pca factor-analysis r bayesian maximum-likelihood mcmc conditional-probability statistical-significance chi-squared proportion estimation error shrinkage application steins-phenomenon
10
Mengapa Anova () dan drop1 () memberikan jawaban berbeda untuk GLMM?

Saya memiliki GLMM formulir: lmer(present? ~ factor1 + factor2 + continuous + factor1*continuous + (1 | factor3), family=binomial) Ketika saya menggunakan drop1(model, test="Chi"), saya mendapatkan hasil yang berbeda daripada jika saya menggunakan Anova(model, type="III")dari paket mobil atau...

r anova glmm r mixed-model bootstrap sample-size cross-validation roc auc sampling stratification random-allocation logistic stata interpretation proportion r regression multiple-regression linear-model lm r cross-validation cart rpart logistic generalized-linear-model econometrics experiment-design causality instrumental-variables random-allocation predictive-models data-mining estimation contingency-tables epidemiology standard-deviation mean ancova psychology statistical-significance cross-validation synthetic-data poisson-distribution negative-binomial bioinformatics sequence-analysis distributions binomial classification k-means distance unsupervised-learning euclidean correlation chi-squared spearman-rho forecasting excel exponential-smoothing binomial sample-size r change-point wilcoxon-signed-rank ranks clustering matlab covariance covariance-matrix normal-distribution simulation random-generation bivariate standardization confounding z-statistic forecasting arima minitab poisson-distribution negative-binomial poisson-regression overdispersion probability self-study markov-process estimation maximum-likelihood classification pca group-differences chi-squared survival missing-data contingency-tables anova proportion