Pertanyaan yang diberi tag auc

13
Mengevaluasi Hutan Acak: OOB vs CV

Ketika kami menilai kualitas Hutan Acak, misalnya menggunakan AUC, apakah lebih tepat untuk menghitung jumlah ini di atas Sampel Luar Tas atau lebih dari seperangkat validasi silang tahan? Saya mendengar bahwa menghitungnya melalui Sampel OOB memberikan penilaian yang lebih pesimistis, tetapi saya...

cross-validation random-forest auc
11
R / mgcv: Mengapa produk tensor () dan ti () menghasilkan permukaan yang berbeda?

The mgcvpaket untuk Rmemiliki dua fungsi untuk pas interaksi produk tensor: te()dan ti(). Saya memahami pembagian kerja dasar antara keduanya (menyesuaikan interaksi non-linear vs menguraikan interaksi ini menjadi efek utama dan interaksi). Yang tidak saya mengerti adalah mengapa te(x1, x2)dan...

r gam mgcv conditional-probability mixed-model references bayesian estimation conditional-probability machine-learning optimization gradient-descent r hypothesis-testing wilcoxon-mann-whitney time-series bayesian inference change-point time-series anova repeated-measures statistical-significance bayesian contingency-tables regression prediction quantiles classification auc k-means scikit-learn regression spatial circular-statistics t-test effect-size cohens-d r cross-validation feature-selection caret machine-learning modeling python optimization frequentist correlation sample-size normalization group-differences heteroscedasticity independence generalized-least-squares lme4-nlme references mcmc metropolis-hastings optimization r logistic feature-selection separation clustering k-means normal-distribution gaussian-mixture kullback-leibler java spark-mllib data-visualization categorical-data barplot hypothesis-testing statistical-significance chi-squared type-i-and-ii-errors pca scikit-learn conditional-expectation statistical-significance meta-analysis intuition r time-series multivariate-analysis garch machine-learning classification data-mining missing-data cart regression cross-validation matrix-decomposition categorical-data repeated-measures chi-squared assumptions contingency-tables prediction binary-data trend test-for-trend matrix-inverse anova categorical-data regression-coefficients standard-error r distributions exponential interarrival-time copula log-likelihood time-series forecasting prediction-interval mean standard-error meta-analysis meta-regression network-meta-analysis systematic-review normal-distribution multiple-regression generalized-linear-model poisson-distribution poisson-regression r sas cohens-kappa
10
Mengapa Anova () dan drop1 () memberikan jawaban berbeda untuk GLMM?

Saya memiliki GLMM formulir: lmer(present? ~ factor1 + factor2 + continuous + factor1*continuous + (1 | factor3), family=binomial) Ketika saya menggunakan drop1(model, test="Chi"), saya mendapatkan hasil yang berbeda daripada jika saya menggunakan Anova(model, type="III")dari paket mobil atau...

r anova glmm r mixed-model bootstrap sample-size cross-validation roc auc sampling stratification random-allocation logistic stata interpretation proportion r regression multiple-regression linear-model lm r cross-validation cart rpart logistic generalized-linear-model econometrics experiment-design causality instrumental-variables random-allocation predictive-models data-mining estimation contingency-tables epidemiology standard-deviation mean ancova psychology statistical-significance cross-validation synthetic-data poisson-distribution negative-binomial bioinformatics sequence-analysis distributions binomial classification k-means distance unsupervised-learning euclidean correlation chi-squared spearman-rho forecasting excel exponential-smoothing binomial sample-size r change-point wilcoxon-signed-rank ranks clustering matlab covariance covariance-matrix normal-distribution simulation random-generation bivariate standardization confounding z-statistic forecasting arima minitab poisson-distribution negative-binomial poisson-regression overdispersion probability self-study markov-process estimation maximum-likelihood classification pca group-differences chi-squared survival missing-data contingency-tables anova proportion